Up to 10 fps at 24.2 MP for up to 89 Frames (Raw) / 177 Frames (JPEG) Up to 8 fps at 24.2 MP Up to 6 fps at 24.2 MP Up to 3 fps at 24.2 MP

Macman4789 wrote: They both have the same number of focus points however the A9 has lower contrast points. Just wanted to insert that the A9 will get more contrast AF-points in the coming firmware update to the same level the A7III has.

The A7 mark II has a larger viewfinder than the EOS RP (0.5-in vs 0.39-in) but the magnification factor is very similar (0.71x on the Sony and 0.7x on the Canon). The resolution is the same (2.36M dots) and so is the 22mm eye point which is decent for someone wearing glasses. The refresh rate of the live view is around 60Hz for both cameras.
Yes (via hot shoe) Yes (via Multi Interface shoe) Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off. 1/200 sec. 1/250 sec. Single, continuous, speed priority continuous, self-timer, bracketing (AE, white balance, DRO) 4.5 fps. 10.0 fps.
The first difference, concerning the build quality, is that the A7 has a magnesium alloy body and is weather resistant (dust and moisture), unlike the A6000. You can also see by looking at the images below that the full frame camera is slightly larger, taller and heavier. A7: 126.9 x 94.4 x 54.8mm, 474g.
The a7R II’s continuous shooting speeds are far more modest. You get 5 frames per second, which is toward the middle (or even the bottom) of the pack. As for buffers, the story is similar: 23 RAW and 23 JPEG shots on the a7R II, versus 40 RAW and 163 JPEG shots on the a7 III. In other words:

has a microphone input. Canon EOS 90D. Sony Alpha a7 III. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack. Canon EOS 90D. Sony Alpha a7 III. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.

Yes, the A7II has more dials and buttons, but the A6000 has enough to shoot manual. sidneylopsides • 8 yr. ago. I see the logic here. The control layout on the A7 is much more manual friendly, for example the front and rear dials, you can use those in M a lot quicker than the two rear dials on the a6000. 9YbIXXA.
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/53
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/214
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/157
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/327
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/286
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/304
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/341
  • o5u66yxb1n.pages.dev/112

    • sony a7 vs a7ii vs a7iii